Briefly

Of course, if I don’t choose interference as a strategy, it is partly because my aim is not to critique walking, running, etc. It is to reflect upon these activities – observing them, pursuing them, articulating them elsewhere. Here my work aligns with the tradition of critical and artistic engagement with aspects of everyday life – Lefebvre, Blanchot, Cereteau, Perec, etc. My aim is less to disrupt the everyday than to discover effective means to engage with its elusive potential. This is not a matter of transforming the everyday into art, but rather of linking art to the everyday – placing the two in a delicate, slightly uncertain relation.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *